Development Pressure
The Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has estimated that as much as 90% of the private land adjacent to lakes will be developed by the year 2025. How will increasing amounts of nearshore development affect the future water quality of our lakes?
Effects of nearshore development
Development of the immediate shoreline can change the character of the lake and potentially cause water quality decline and reduced habitat for fish and other wildlife.
When a landowner develops a waterfront lot, many changes may take place including the addition of driveways, houses, decks, garages, sheds, piers, rafts and other structures, wells, septic systems, lawns, and more. Many of these changes result in the compaction of soil and the removal of trees and native plants, as well as the addition of impervious (hard) surfaces, all of which affect how well rain and snowmelt can soak into the ground and alter how precipitation makes its way into our lakes.
Changing one waterfront lot in this fashion may not result in a measurable change in the overall quality of the lake or stream, but cumulative effects when several or many lots are developed in a similar way can be enormous.
Top
Development across the watershed
Changes in land use throughout a lake’s watershed can significantly impact lake water quality. Research has shown that as the amount of impervious surfaces increases throughout the watershed, there is a corresponding decline in surface water quality.
When more than 15-20% of the entire watershed area is covered by impervious surfaces, water degradation follows.
More impervious surfaces mean an increase in polluted runoff from roads, lawns, construction sites, storm sewers, and other sources making its way into lakes.
Top
Changes in land use
In addition to increasing amounts of impervious surfaces, changes in land use near the shore and throughout the watershed can have big impacts on lake water quality.
Over time, Wisconsin’s landscape has been drastically changed from pre-settlement conditions. These changes have had effects on many of our lakes. When forests were cleared and wetlands filled, many lakes lost their natural “filters.” The forests and wetlands slowed down rain and snowmelt, and much of this precipitation soaked into the ground where it was used by plants or into groundwater where it gradually made its way into the lakes. Forest and wetlands also play a critical role to strain out excess nutrients and other pollutants from runoff before it entered lakes. The state’s prairies performed a similar function; deep rooted prairie plants helped keep water in the soil and prevented erosion.
Many of these lands were cleared for agriculture, cities, and roads. Unlike impervious surfaces, farm fields do provide area for rain and snow to soak into the ground, but crops have a low density and diversity of plants, so often rain and snow is not slowed down, and runoff—often carrying fertilizers, herbicides, and other products—results.
Top
Habitat fragmentation
Development also fragments habitat. Many species need relatively large areas of undisturbed habitat to gather food and raise their young. When habitat is sliced and diced apart by roads, houses, and other more intense land uses, wildlife may be unable or unwilling to cross these new boundaries. Nesting cover and foraging areas may be destroyed or degraded, and native wildlife declines in diversity and abundance.
Top
Minimizing the impact of development on lakes
Local governments have used a variety of tools—lake classification, comprehensive "Smart Growth" planning, strengthening shoreland zoning standards, developing ordinances—to help protect lakes and plan for development within the watershed. Strategies to minimize the impact of development on lakes include:
- Setting back structures away from the shoreline
- Concentrating structures on an area of land and leaving open space
- Minimizing the amount of impervious surfaces such as driveways and roads
- Maintaining natural shorelines
Top