|
|
Assembly Bill (AB-299) would weaken
shoreland protections |
|
Under present law, county shoreland zoning ordinances
have included minimum standards for lake shorelines
in unincorporated areas. Thousands of lakefront property
owners in unincorporated areas have invested millions
of dollars in structures that meet the current statewide
minimum standards for shoreland development.
Current law protects these property owners' investments by
ensuring that unincorporated land that is being annexed by a
city or village retains statewide minimum shoreland standards
until the city or village enacts its own ordinance that meets
statewide minimum standards or the county government amends
its shoreland ordinance to reflect special circumstances.
AB 299 would immediately eliminate all shoreland zoning
requirements for land that is annexed by a city or village.
Its passage would dramatically reduce water protections by
eliminating protections for some areas on lakes, allowing
development to be closer to the water and at greater
densities.
The Wisconsin Association of Lakes feels this bill is
likely to undermine property values and threaten the near
shore environment; we oppose this bill. When this bill passes
the Senate Natural Resources Committee, it will go before the
full Senate for approval. We encourage you to contact
your State Senator and let him/her know you want him/her
to protect your lake by voting against AB- 299.
|
|
|
|
|
Assembly Bill (AB-850) would undermine
pier rules, rule process |
|
Several members of the Legislature are trying to
push through a bill that would change water regulations
statutes less than 2 years since they were changed.
We wonder why this legislation is coming forth at
this time. 2003 Act 118, changed the permitting process
for piers, codified the pier planner, created an exempt
category for piers, and attempted to clarify the whole
pier permitting process. The Act gave the DNR the
ability to write rules to administer the statute.
Yet the rule has not yet gone to the Legislature for
approval. Why are they now changing the statute? The
stakeholder group that helped draft this rule worked
very hard to craft a rule that followed the statute
and would be acceptable to most people. Why not let
the rule come to the legislature?
The Wisconsin Association of Lakes opposes AB 850
for the following reasons:
- This bill will allow a boat slip for each and
every “dwelling” on a piece of property. This means
every keyhole residence, and every condominium on
a given parcel would be able to have a boat slip.
So if a condo unit had 30 units, there could be
a single pier with 30 boat slips on a narrow piece
of frontage land.
- The bill creates substantially more uncertainty
for owners of piers that are greater than 6 feet
wide and/or longer than to three feet depth of water
or long enough to moor a boat. Without requiring
registration (a permit) for larger piers, who will
know that the pier is, in fact, legal, even under
the proposed bill.
- Existing piers that are now illegally interfering
with another riparians rights or damaging public
waters will become legal, with no recourse for those
harmed.
- The proposed bill changes long standing rules
for prohibiting problematic piers. The proposed
bill requires the DNR to “prove by a preponderance
of evidence that the structure presents an imminent
and substantial danger to navigation or the public
interest,” and not just “interfering with public
rights.” It seems this language is intended to create
a set of pier rules that are effectively unenforceable.
The full text of the proposed bill is available online.
We encourage you to contact
your assembly representative and let them know your
thoughts on this bill. |
|
|
|
|
Let your legislators know you love your
lakes! |
|
Conservation
Lobby Day 2006 to be held January 25th
The Wisconsin
Association of Lakes is joining a coalition of statewide
conservation groups to bring together citizens from
across the state to talk with legislators about clean
water, quality sporting opportunities, and Wisconsin’s
conservation priorities.
Conservation
Lobby Day offers you the opportunity to talk to your
legislative representatives about your concerns and
hopes for Wisconsin's lakes. Your perspective as a
local lake person will help your elected legislator
understand the issues that are important to our lakes
and vote to protect the things we all value about
Wisconsin’s special lakes.
Two of
this year’s Conservation Lobby Day priorities focus
on issues that negatively impact many of our lakes:
polluted runoff, and declining groundwater levels.
We feel there are two additional issues of importantance
to lakes that our legislative representatives need
to hear more about; shoreland protection, and aquatic
invasive species prevention and control. The Coalition
and the Wisconsin Association of Lakes are developing
talking points on each of these issues, which will
be available well in advance of the event.
Make
your voice heard in the Capitol.
Registration
for Conservation Lobby Day 2006 is being handled by
the Wisconsin League of Conservation Voters.
Priority
Lake Issues
Polluted runoff
Despite
being the first state in the country to enact strong
polluted runoff rules, runoff remains Wisconsin’s
leading water quality problem. Runoff is excess
water that washes hard surfaces—such as roads and
roof tops—instead of soaking into the ground. As
runoff water rushes off the land it carries fertilizers
like phosphorus, sediments, salts, and other pollutants
into our lakes, causing numerous problems.
Groundwater decline and Great Lakes water diversion
Groundwater
flow is one of several sources of water for lakes.
When the amount of groundwater flowing into a lake
is reduced, the total volume of a lake and/or the
flow of water through a lake can be reduced, which
negatively impacts the lake’s ecosystem, water quality,
and recreational uses. Declining groundwater levels—caused
by higher water use demands and increased hard surfaces
that prevent water from soaking into the ground
and higher water use demands— threaten a growing
number of our inland lakes.
Aquatic invasive species prevention and control
Aquatic
invasive species are costing taxpayers millions
of dollars by lowering property values, degrading
habitat, and displacing native plants, wildlife,
and fish species. Invasive species impact recreation
by harming native sport fish populations. Invasive
plants often form dense mats that make boating,
fishing, and swimming difficult. The costs to control
invasive species are extremely high. Individual
lakes may spend tens of thousands of dollars per
year to simply manage (not eradicate) invasive plant
populations.
Shoreland protection
Protecting
natural shorelines prevents polluted runoff from
entering lakes, helps control flooding, provides
fish and wildlife habitat, preserves privacy and
natural scenic beauty, and enhances public rights
and private property values. Shorelands are sensitive
areas and are critical to our lakes' health.
|
|
|
|
|
Wisconsin behind in water
conservation |
|
A new report released by Midwest Environmental Advocates
examines water conservation in Wisconsin, and finds
the state has fallen behind. Increasingly, Wisconsin
communities are experiencing water quality and quantity
problems. This emerging trend is problematic as water
is essential to economic development and sustainability,
as well as necessary for the continued health and
well being of Wisconsin citizens and our shared natural
resources.
Protecting Wisconsin's Waters: A Conservation Report and
Toolkit identifies disincentives to water conservation
within our laws and regulatory systems, including some which
provide economic incentives to waste water. The report also
evaluates water conservation within the context of Wisconsin’s
land use laws and policies.
The report finds water conservation opportunities that
exist under current and emerging law, describes existing best
management practices and water conservation initiatives, and
provides a water conservation toolkit to guide
decision-makers.
|
|
|
|
|
Is “Up North”
vanishing? |
|
Lake ecology is only one aspect of Wisconsin lakes.
Our perception of our relationship with lakes is equally
important. How we think about lakes affects how we
treat them. Our lakes are special places not only
because of their natural beauty, but because of the
relationships we form with others while enjoying our
lake, and the meaning we associate with being at the
lake or “Up North.” All of our lake experiences contribute
to a “Sense of Place."
A recent paper by Richard Stedman--Department of
Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology at Pennsylvania
State University—examines the relationship between
our sense of place and lakeshore development in northern
Wisconsin. He suggests that “Up North,” has an understood
meaning as a place of high environmental quality and
escape from civilization.
Stedman surveyed over 1,000 property owners in northern
Wisconsin's lake-rich Vilas County. Conclusions from
this survey include:
- Low levels of development are a perceived characteristic
of "Up North" lakes.
- Increasing the amount of lakeshore development
causes a decline in residents' perception that their
lake is indeed "Up North."
- Increasing amounts of lakeshore development leads
to residents feeling less satisfied and attached
to their lake.
- Increasing the number of people within a lake
community leads to more opportunities for social
relationships; positive social relationships can
increase residents' sense of attachment to their
lake.
- When people feel attached to their lake, they
are more willing to act to protect the lake.
- Ironically, when people are satisfied with their
lake, they are less willing to act to protect it.
This suggests that people are often not willing
to become involved in lake protection activities
until the lake has undergone significant negative
change.
Stedman speculates that developed lakes are no longer
“the real Up-North” when they have been impacted by
human use; but they do become more social places. We
are still attached to developed lakes because of the
social relationships. However, developed lakes are felt
to be less satisfying, and we are less willing to protect
developed lakes against future environmental change.
|
|
|
|
|
Problematic blue green algae health risks difficult to
predict |
|
Blue green algae are photosynthesizing bacteria that
have existed in Wisconsin lakes for millions of years.
In recent decades, excessive nutrients from human
activities have fueled worsening algal blooms. In
addition to the negative impacts associated with algal
blooms— excess algae can block sunlight, deplete oxygen
in the water, and contribute to fish kills—blue green
algae can produce a variety of toxins that can affect
human and animal nervous systems, kidneys and skin.
High concentrations of blue-green algae occurred in 2004
and 2005 in some waters in all regions of Wisconsin, but the
algae didn’t always produce the toxins that can pose a health
threat to people and animals, according to a new study by the
Department of Natural Resources. Not all species of blue-green
algae produce toxins, and even those that produce toxins don’t
produce them all the time. These findings suggest predicting
when blue green algae will be a health risk is more complex
than originally thought, and there is no quick and easy way to
decide whether water quality is unsafe for water users and
local officials.
|
|
|
|
|